3 September 2010    Login
Library

ANA in the News
Livermore National Laboratory

published Tuesday, July 13, 2010  867 Views :: 0 Comments

LIVERMORE -- The Fiscal Year 2011 Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan (colloquially known as the "Green Book"), obtained recently by Tri-Valley CAREs, reveals that the U.S. Dept. of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) foments internal plans significantly at variance with the agency's public pronouncements and the Nation's disarmament goals.

"The document demonstrates that the NNSA will reach deeper and deeper into the taxpayers' pockets in the coming decades, even as it jettisons scientific objectives and delivers less," charged Marylia Kelley, executive director of Tri-Valley CAREs, the Livermore-based nuclear weapons watchdog organization. " What the plan reveals about the National Ignition Facility (NIF) is shocking." (See attached analysis for details.)

read more..

published Thursday, February 25, 2010  973 Views :: 0 Comments

Livermore Opens Its Doors to Outsiders
Long-Secretive Weapons Labs to Build Energy Research Center Where Government Scientists, Businesses Can Collaborate

By BENJAMIN PIMENTEL
Found on WSJ.com; view here.

Livermore, home to two major U.S. weapons laboratories, existed as a city of fences and secrets during the Cold War and for years afterward. Now, some of those fences are receding.

Both of the city's weapons labs—Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories—are moving forward on plans to build a campus where government scientists and outside researchers can work together on clean-energy technology.

...

But the open campus also has attracted critics. Marylia Kelley, of Tri-Valley Communities Against a Radioactive Environment, an advocacy group long opposed to the labs' nuclear-weapons development, says the project could be "a green-washing, public-relations move" meant "to give an imprimatur of environmental responsibility" to what she calls "the very dirty work of researching and developing new and modified nuclear bombs."

read more..

published Tuesday, February 02, 2010  2099 Views :: 0 Comments

Tuesday, Feb. 2, 2010
By Martin Matishak
Global Security Newswire

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration yesterday unveiled a spending plan that would increase funding for the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration to $11.2 billion in the next fiscal year (see GSN, Jan. 29).

The agency, a semiautonomous branch of the Energy Department, would receive a 13.4-percent budget increase in fiscal 2011 to maintain the country's nuclear stockpile and conduct nonproliferation activities around the globe, according to the White House funding request.

More than $7 billion would be devoted beginning Oct. 1 to "weapons activities," which ensure the safety and performance of the nation's atomic stockpile. The amount is a $624 million increase from this year.

Another $2.7 billion would be funneled to the agency's Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation program, a hike of 25.8 percent above fiscal 2010. That effort seeks to secure nuclear materials around the globe that could be used for weapons and convert them for peaceful purposes.

read more..

published Friday, December 11, 2009  1708 Views :: 1 Comments

Associated Press - December 10, 2009

LIVERMORE, Calif. (AP) - A federal report says improper accounting practices at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory have hidden $80 million in additional costs for a new facility dedicated in May.

The National Ignition Facility studies nuclear fusion, which could provide the country with another clean energy source (sic). The October report by the National Nuclear Security Administration says the facility is not contributing its fair share to the overall running of Lawrence lab in accordance with federal accounting standards. That means other departments have been left to pick up the tab, which amounts to about $80 million in this fiscal year alone.

read more..

published Thursday, December 10, 2009  1238 Views :: 0 Comments

December 10, 2009
Originally Appeared here

LIVERMORE – An internal U.S. Dept. of Energy (DOE) study details how managers at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) shifted costs to understate total spending on the controversial National Ignition Facility (NIF) mega-laser. The previously secret document, released today by the nuclear watchdog group Tri-Valley CAREs, pegs the current hidden costs of NIF at $80 million annually.

"Livermore Lab is systematically disguising the true costs of the NIF," charged Tri-Valley CAREs' executive director, Marylia Kelley. "When calculated over the life of the project, these hidden costs total more than $2 billion." Kelley continued, "This illegal scheme circumvents the United States Congress, which sets NIF's budget each year, and violates our nation's most basic federal contracting laws."

read more..

published Friday, November 06, 2009  4649 Views :: 24 Comments

Sandia Director Makes $1.7 million
By John Fleck
Thursday, 05 November 2009 19:16

Sandia National Laboratories Director Tom Hunter makes $1.7 million per
year, according to data made public this week.

Los Alamos National Laboratory Director Michael Anastasio makes $800
thousand per year. The numbers became public this week when the labs reported them as one of
the conditions of accepting money under the federal stimulus program.
The compensation triggered outrage from critics of the nuclear weapons
research centers.

Originally Published in the Albuquerque Journal.

read more..

published Tuesday, October 06, 2009  1291 Views :: 3 Comments

Nuclear material stockpile dwindling at Livermore lab

By Suzanne Bohan
Contra Costa Times 10/02/2009

Two-thirds of the plutonium and weapons-grade uranium stored at Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory has been removed, the agency overseeing the
lab announced this week.

The removal of the "special nuclear material" marks a milestone in the
National Nuclear Security Administration's goal of "denuking" the Livermore
lab by 2012, two years ahead of its original target of 2014. To save costs,
the dangerous radioactive materials will be consolidated at five sites -
none in California - down from 10 sites nationwide listed in a 2007
Government Accountability Office report.

read more..

published Monday, September 14, 2009  935 Views :: 1 Comments

Originally published at http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090910_a_hundred_holocausts_an_insiders_window_into_us_nuclear_policy/
Posted on Sep 10, 2009
By Daniel Ellsberg

Editor’s note: This is the first installment of Daniel Ellsberg’s personal memoir of the nuclear era, “The American Doomsday Machine.” The online book will recount highlights of his six years of research and consulting for the Departments of Defense and State and the White House on issues of nuclear command and control, nuclear war planning and nuclear crises. It further draws on 34 subsequent years of research and activism largely on nuclear policy , which followed the intervening 11 years of his preoccupation with the Vietnam War . Subsequent installments also will appear on Truthdig. The author is a senior fellow of theNuclear Age Peace Foundation .

American Planning for a Hundred Holocausts
One day in the spring of 1961, soon after my 30th birthday, I was shown how our world would end. Not the Earth, not—so far as I knew then—all humanity or life, but the destruction of most cities and people in the Northern Hemisphere.

What I was handed, in a White House office, was a single sheet of paper with some numbers and lines on it. It was headed “Top Secret—Sensitive”; under that, “For the President’s Eyes Only.”

The “Eyes Only” designation meant that, in principle, it was to be seen and read only by the person to whom it was explicitly addressed, in this case the president. In practice this usually meant that it would be seen by one or more secretaries and assistants as well: a handful of people, sometimes somewhat more, instead of the scores to hundreds who would normally see copies of a “Top Secret—Sensitive” document.

read more..

published Friday, September 04, 2009  1279 Views :: 0 Comments

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 4, 2009
Contact: Jay Coghlan, Nuclear Watch NM, 505.989.7342, c. 505.920.7118, jay@nukewatch.org

Santa Fe, NM – Nuclear Watch New Mexico (NWNM) has discovered Los Alamos National Laboratory viewgraphs showing that the U.S. nuclear weapons labs want to leverage “stockpile modernization” through formal Safeguards attached to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty during Senate ratification. This modernization would include “large changes” made to existing nuclear weapons refurbished during existing Life Extension Programs, and/or complete “replacement designs” as early as 2015. Congress has rejected funding a new-design “Reliable Replacement Warhead” (RRW) for the last two years, but the labs have clearly not given up. Moreover, there is a danger that the Obama Administration might concede to some form of RRW in order to win the Congressional supermajority of 67 needed to ratify the CTBT. Further, Obama has just reappointed a formerly strong proponent of RRW to again head up the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration.

A decade ago, under President Clinton, the Senate rejected CTBT ratification. This last April, while declaring that a world free of nuclear weapons is a long term U.S. national security goal, President Obama pledged, “my Administration will immediately and aggressively pursue U.S. ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.” The Treaty’s declared purpose has always been to cut off the advancement of nuclear weapons. But the American labs, now endowed with supercomputer simulated testing, obviously believe that a ban to physical tests no longer blocks the deployment of new nuclear weapons designs. In contrast, they now even seek to enshrine the capability for major modifications and possible new-designs in CTBT Safeguards.

Ratification of the CTBT by the U.S. will be viewed internationally as a concrete sign of America’s commitment to fulfilling the 1970 NonProliferation Treaty’s mandate for nuclear disarmament. CTBT ratification before the May 2010 NPT Review Conference at the United Nations would be a diplomatic victory, if the Obama Administration can win the necessary Senate votes. Ironically, possible CTBT Safeguards enshrining new or heavily modified U.S. weapons designs could derail the strengthening of the global nonproliferation regime by demonstrating to other countries that the U.S. is not really serious about nuclear disarmament.

read more..

published Monday, August 10, 2009  1783 Views :: 0 Comments

LIVERMORE — About 75 protesters gathered at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory early Thursday to commemorate the Aug. 6, 1945 bombing of Hiroshima as well as to protest the development and use of nuclear weapons.

The protest was peaceful but 22 people were arrested by Lawrence Livermore Lab security for blocking the lab's entrance said Bob Hirschfeld, a lab spokesman. Those arrested were handcuffed, cited and released.

Originally published in the Contra Costa Times: http://www.contracostatimes.com/environment/ci_13009155


read more..

  
Article List page 1 of 3
Next Page  

 

DC Days 2010


The US Nuclear Weapons Complex


Concrete Treaty-Based Steps to Reduce the Nuclear Threat


Cleaning Up the Nuclear Legacy


No Nuclear Power Bailout


Reprocessing and Plutonium - Not the Basis for Clean Energy


DC Days 2009


-Complex Transformation Wrong Policy, Wrong Priority, Wrong Direction


-Halting Unnecessary Nuclear Weapons Production


-Towards a Nuclear Weapons Free World


-Reprocessing and Plutonium Fuel Are Not Clean Energy


-Cleaning up the Nuclear Weapons Legacy


-Protecting the Environment from Nuclear Waste and Power

 

-Plutonium "Triggers" for Nuclear Bombs

 

-Permanently Ending Nuclear Testing

 

-Plutonium Disposition Remains in Disarray

 

-Radiation Standards



DC Days 2008

-Environmental Cleanup of the Nuclear Weapons Complex

-Spent Fuel Reprocessing and the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership

-Proposed Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository

-Plutonium Disposition: Vitrification vs. MOX Reactor Fuel

-The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program and "Complex Transformation"

-Nuclear Weapons Policy

-Life Extension Programs

-Plutonium "Triggers" for Nuclear Bombs


DC Days 2007

-DOE "Accelerated Cleanup":  Doesn't Meet Legal Requirements, Fails to Save Time and Money

-Complex 2030:  Undermines Security, Threatens Environment


-Global Nuclear Eneergy Partnership:  Environmental  and Security Risks


-Wanted:  Justice for Nuclear Testing Victims

-U.S. Plutonium Plans:  Weapons, Waste and Proliferation

-Nuclear Weapons Forever:  The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program

-Yucca Mountain Project:  Not the Solution to Nuclear Weapons


© 2010 Alliance for Nuclear Accountability   |  Citadel Hosting  |  Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement